Lost Christianities. The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Bart D. Ehrman. Shows how early forms of Christianity came to be. The early Christian Church was a chaos of contending beliefs, according to Bart Ehrman, author of Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We . From Publishers Weekly. What if Marcion’s canon-which consisted only of Luke’s Gospel and Paul’s letters, entirely omitting the Old Testament-had become.
|Published (Last):||19 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||20.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
LOST CHRISTIANITIES: The Battles for Scriptures and the Faiths We Never Knew
Religious labels need some definition to be useful at all. The Triumph of Christianity: Instead, it gives voice to early Christian groups that were sincere and trying to understand Jesus’ messageb but who had very different interpretations than the group that formed the new testament. I think those reads assisted me in losy enjoying and understanding this book; my previous reading experiences “greased the rails” for this book.
Like all of the other Teaching Company The Great Courses lectures, this course opens topics that allow the individual to dig a little deeper Surely these “false teachers” also felt that the writers of the NT had it wrong. Write a customer review. Or do you think that Judaism would have remained equal with that version of Christianity?
Lost Christianities – Bart D. Ehrman – Oxford University Press
They would have kept what is now our Gospel of Matthew but maybe not any of the baet Gospels. Ehrman is the James A.
Or would it have remained a small group of people? If you’re interested in this subject, this is a great read. That said, the book makes it clear why the Pauline model succeeded and the others failed the book goes perfectly with Rodney Stark’s classic “How New Religions Succeed” and gives fhristianities eye-opening glimpse into how not only Christianity, but all social institutions develop.
Follow the Author
Only those Christians whose knowledge of Christianity is bounded by Billy Graham in the past and the Apocalypse in the future will be shocked to learn in part three that people argue about religious texts. Brillcoeditor in chief for the journal Vigiliae Christianae, and on several other editorial boards for journals and monographs in the field. In piecing together that puzzle, Ehrman has produced a work of art worthy of Picasso.
Not only are the historical facts that he presents fascinating–and challenging to many diehard Christians– but they’re “crucial” for ALL to read and understand.
Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew by Bart D. Ehrman
Soon thereafter the Church saw a flood of books also allegedly written by the earliest followers of Jesus, forgeries in the names of the apostles, produced for decades, centuries even, after the apostles themselves were long dead and buried.
I must say that this book was a great follow-up to ” Misquoting Jesus: Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. This book opens the reader’s mind to the possibility that the traditional “orth I must say that this book was a great follow-up to ” Misquoting Jesus: But he has done so by leaving out pieces of the puzzle, and by cutting others to fit.
In either case, it’s a quick, easy read, and parts one on the discovery of non-canonical early christian texts and two on the varieties of early christian thought and practice are well worth your attention.
Showing of reviews. Please write another, while I track down the dozen-or-so Ehrman books I’ve yet to read. I have read many books similar to this book, so I just leave it up to the Holy Spirit to ehrmah me through all that the world is and hope to see truth in all things.
Apparently, the New Testament was a sort of group effort, in which christianitirs different points of view from many ehrmn authors were categorized as either good acceptable doctrineor bad not so acceptable doctrine. But, how, exactly, do the proto-orthodox, who at the time had no state power and were occasionally subject to persecution, carry out their “machinations” except by intellectual persuasion and accepted authority which itself implies that orthodoxy was established earlier than Ehrman suggests.
Overall I enjoyed the book as an introduction to some of the early Christian groups, but don’t expect to bqrt to much about any single group. For any ejrman interested in the history, authenticity of the New Testament books, this is a must reading.
This is why I think he went away from the age after 12 to 30 to be educated and influenced in the eastern way of life only to develop truth so that each people could understand truth. Winners and Losers Chapter Nine: Their teachings varied widely from each other. Virtually all of this other literature has been destroyed, forgotten, lost.
From the Ebionites, who followed the laws of Judaism and used only a version of Matthew as their gospel, to the Marcionites, who only used the letters of Paul and Luke and NO old testament, there were many different interpretations of the religion.
Bart Ehrman has the rare gift of communicating scholarship in writing that is lively, enjoyable, and accessible. Amazon Ehrmwn Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life.
They thought he was a heretic.