The Clash of Civilizations is a hypothesis that people’s cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world. The American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington argued that future. Samuel Huntington argues in his landmark essay that after the Cold War, conflicts over cultural and religious identity will dominate global politics. ¿Choque de civilizaciones? (pp. ). Samuel P. Huntington. https://www. Read Online · Download PDF; Save; Cite this Item · xml.
|Published (Last):||16 June 2006|
|PDF File Size:||14.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
When the books claims something like this: Core state conflicts are on a global level between the major states of different civilizations.
Russia, for example, clashes with the many Muslim ethnic groups on its southern border such as Chechnya but—according to Huntington—cooperates with Iran to avoid further Muslim-Orthodox violence in Southern Russia, and to help continue the flow of oil.
Huntington identifies a major shift of economic, military, and political power from the West to the other civilizations of the world, most significantly to what he identifies as the two “challenger civilizations”, Sinic and Islam. About 1, years of Islamic history shows another thing. Huntington argued that future wars would be fought not between countries, but between cultures, and that Islamic extremism would become the biggest threat to world peace.
Samuel Huntington – Wikiquote
These conflicts may result from a number of causes, such as: They have a set of mutual cultural, social, economic and political views and norms which radically differ from those civilizacionrs the Fe and the Far East. Huntington believed that while the age of ideology had ended, the world had only reverted to a normal state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict.
He also gives the example of Australia as a country torn between its Western civilizational heritage and its growing economic engagement with Asia. Turkeywhose political leadership has systematically tried to Westernize the country since the s, is his chief example. The Global Politics of Civilizations”. Oxford University Press; The initiative is intended to galvanize collective action across diverse societies to combat extremismto overcome cultural and social barriers between mainly the Western and predominantly Muslim worlds, and to saumel the tensions and polarization between societies which differ in religious and cultural aamuel.
Russia, Japan, and India are what Huntington terms ‘swing civilizations’ and may favor either side.
Huntington believes this to be a real consequence of several factors, including the previously mentioned Muslim youth bulge and population growth and Islamic proximity to many civilizations including Sinic, Orthodox, Western, and African. Huntington refers to countries that are seeking to affiliate with another civilization as “torn countries”.
Regional powers such as the two Koreas and Vietnam will acquiesce to Chinese demands and become more supportive of China rather than attempting to oppose it. After twenty years this book became prophetic, about after Cold War world. This book is good and sometimes is very prophetic. Huntington argues that Russia is primarily a non-Western state although he seems to agree that it shares a considerable amount of cultural ancestry with the modern West.
In this book the world becames divided and in conflict because of religious conflicts. Huntington sees the West as reluctant to accept this because it built the international system, wrote its laws, and gave it substance in the form of the United Nations.
More recent factors contributing to a Western—Islamic clash, Huntington wrote, are the Islamic Resurgence and demographic explosion in Islam, coupled with the values of Western universalism—that is, the view that all civilizations should adopt Western values—that infuriate Islamic fundamentalists.
Its political and economic elite must support the move. Editorial Tecnos ha considerado de interes dar a conocer en lengua espanola el articulo de Samuel P. Huntington que da titulo a esta edicion, y que fue publicado en la prestigiosa revista estadounidense Foreign Affairs en Japan, China and the Four Asian Tigers have modernized in many respects while maintaining traditional or authoritarian societies which distinguish them from the West.
But after the end of the Cold Warworld politics moved into a new phase, in which non-Western civilizations are no longer the exploited recipients of Western civilization but have become additional important actors joining the West to shape and move world history. Clear and Present Strangers: Huntington also believes that some of the factors contributing to this conflict are that both Christianity upon which Western civilization is based and Islam are:. Specifically, he identifies common Chinese and Islamic interests in the areas of weapons proliferation, human rights, and democracy that conflict with those of the West, and feels that these are areas in which the two civilizations will cooperate.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. In the past, world history was mainly about the struggles between monarchs, nations and ideologies, such as seen within Western civilization.
The American political scientist Samuel P. This page was last edited on 12 Decemberat International Politics, 42, pp. In his book Terror and LiberalismPaul Berman argues that distinct cultural boundaries do not exist in the present day. According to Huntington, the West is distinguished from Orthodox Christian countries by its experience of the RenaissanceReformationthe Enlightenment ; by overseas colonialism rather than contiguous expansion and colonialism; and by the infusion of Classical culture through ancient Greece rather than through the continuous trajectory of the Byzantine Empire.
This has been successfully demonstrated by documenting the rise of Christianity from the Hellenized Roman Empirethe rise of the Islamic caliphates from the Christianized Roman Empire and the rise of Ottoman rule from the Islamic caliphates and the Christianized Roman Huntingtno.
Huntington began his thinking by surveying the diverse theories about the nature of global politics in the post-Cold War period. Retrieved from ” https: Some of these countries have clashed with the West and some have not. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Here in Brazil, Protestantism, in fact Pentecostalism, is a bad force. Specifically, Francis Fukuyama argued that chkque world had reached the ‘ end of history ‘ in a Hegelian sense.
These critics [ who? Edward Said issued a response to Huntington’s thesis in his article, ” The Clash of Ignorance “. El resultado es esta edicion, en la que las tesis del famoso politologo estadounidense aparecen expuestas con toda su carga polemica, y a la vez son analizados sus aciertos y omisiones para permitir al lector obtener sus propias sammuel.
Write a customer review. A longtime critic of the Huntingtonian paradigm, and an outspoken proponent of Arab issues, Edward Said also argues that the clash of civilizations thesis is an example of “the huntingtoon invidious racism, a sort hhuntington parody of Hitlerian science directed today against Arabs and Muslims” p. Samuel Philllips Huntington was prophetic about our world, in this books.
Huntington’s geopolitical model, especially the structures for North Africa and Eurasia, is largely derived from the ” Intermediate Region ” geopolitical model first formulated by Dimitri Kitsikis and published in Critics of Huntington’s ideas often extend their criticisms to traditional cultures and internal reformers who wish to modernize without adopting the values and attitudes of Western culture.
All these historical and modern factors huntignton, Huntington wrote briefly in his Foreign Affairs article and in much more detail in civilizacione book, would lead to a bloody clash between the Islamic and Western civilizations. Perhaps the ultimate example of non-Western modernization is Russia, the core state of the Orthodox civilization.